Sunday, December 7, 2008

POLL

Josh and I recently debated this topic last night... which was a bigger change... going from 1 to 2 kids or going from 2 to 3 kids? Or is there another answer we haven't considered? Talk amongst yourselves then let me know!

4 comments:

Jacqui said...

Erika, I love that you post while I'm at church. It gives me something to do while the kids rest (**cough, cough--watch a movie) and I wait for Kraig to come home.

Since I don't have numero 3 yet, I'm going to have to vote for the 2 kids to 3. 1 to 2 wasn't that bad for me. Well, back then it wasn't that bad. But then I go on an errand with just one kid and I think, "Wow! This was easy!"

The Yancey Family said...

I have always heard that going from 2 to three is the absolute hardest because the parents are suddenly outnumbered. For that reason, I am terrified of having three kids. I thought from 1 to 2 was pretty hard, so I am hoping I will find that 2 to 3 is easier. I am interested in what other people think too!

Elizabeth said...

I think going from 2 to 3 was the hardest adjustment. 1 to 2 wasn't hard at all and after 3 it's just one more to the mix. I cant' quite pinpoint what about the 3rd is hard though.

libbie said...

definitely 2 to 3. I am still trying to get the hang of it. Oh, and also, getting your body back in shape, is even harder .. . . for me anyway!